Dr. McKalip Threatened by Occupy St. Pete.

“For this you have been selected as a man to make an example of. You hide behind freedoms the people you attack are defending, no more. This is not a threat, just a warning. We’ll be seeing you, but you won’t be seeing us. See you at the next appointment Doc. You should have expected us.”  Mr. Montoya of Occupy St. Pete, threatening Dr. McKalip.

Tonight, as I was composing the post I put out tonight on coming problems in America, I received this “warning” from Occupy st. Pete that I would be “made an example of” and they would see me but I would not see them…. 

The police have been notified. I am not suprised that people in this Occupy movement would resort to intimidation tactics, threats and thug like tactics. Apparently they have the right to exercize their free speech and the right to stifle my free speech with intimdation and implied violence.

I ask for your prayers to protect me and my fanily and trust that God will see me through this episode. Hopefully this sheds true light on this nonsensical movement.

  • Tuesday, November 29. 2011 Mr. Montoya wrote:
    David, We do not expect you to post this on you pathetic little web site. This is a personal message to you. You have over stepped your bounds by personally attacking members of your community. You have as much of a right to free speech as anyone, but you seem to believe you are beyond the responsibility that goes with that right. For this you have been selected as a man to make an example of. You hide behind freedoms the people you attack are defending, no more. This is not a threat, just a warning. We’ll be seeing you, but you won’t be seeing us. See you at the next appointment Doc. You should have expected us.
    Reply to this

  • Tuesday, November 29. 2011 David McKalip wrote:
    Oh Mr. Montoya, I DID execpt you to target me for exposing some of these activities in public.I would expect nothing less than threats from folks like you. You see, I have respected your process from day one, but you apparently think it is okay to threatent people with Lord knows what. Do you seek to intimidate me into silence?So sad.The police have been notified of your threat.
    David
  • The man’s posting info is here.  Although it is likely fake.



  • 93.114.44.37
facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmailfacebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

5 Replies:

  1. Tony Rawson

    David, I don’t know who the hell this person is and you should know enough about the moment to understand that no one speaks for the movement but the GA. To blame our entire movement for some anonymous message you claim to have recieved have recieved via the internet is both dishonest and irresponsible on your part. At this point I don’t know which is worse, the message you recieved or your own attempt to use this unsourced message to slander our entire movement.

  2. Chuck Terzian

    While I don’t agree with this veiled attempt to put you on guard, I still have to question your logic. This one person, whomever it is… is NOT Occupy St. Pete. Stop equating the actions of one person with the actions of a group. This is terrible logic and nullifies your credibility.

  3. David McKalip

    Tony, Chuck,
    I am sorry you are concerned that this person has been linked to your group. I have every reason to draw that conclusion.

    1. AT the Occupy meeting last saturday, your “Direct ACtion” group stated they were “targetting” people (Lenny Flank said this) and that it must be kept secret to protect the safety and integrity of those carrying out the operation.

    2. You each and many on your movement have justified several violent activities as completely acceptable. You have done so to me on the web and personally. These activities that you not only refuse to renounce, but actually think are legitimate include: Kidnapping (so called “Citizens arrests”), Breaking and entering (entering private abandoned property, Tresspassing (entering private businesses and “occupying” their facilitites), obstructing traffic (blocking streets and ports) and more.

    3. You and your group BANNED ME from your forums for suggesting that you specifically renounce those activities and took offense that I would even raise the subject.

    4. There are leaders in the shadows who are pulling the puppet strings that you refuse to identify in public. Why?

    5. I have not been involved with ANY OTHER Occupy group. The message I received specifically occured because of my activities on my blog to shed light on what your group was doing.

    6. There are people in your group who have been incredibly rude and confrontational to me asking me to leave and telling me that I had no right to speak because I did not agree with what you were trying to accomplish…all while you won’t even SAY what you want to accomplish! (Maria Agosto, Maria JOse, Frank the DNC marketting operative).

    7. Remember, I HAVE been targetting by your group as one to ban and to attack. This has occured on your forums using nonsensical reasons that simply amount to “we don’t want to have this guy here”.

    So, I have every reason to draw these conclusions. Even though many of you are kind and accepting, in the end you each and everyone supported banning me form the forums for my call to renounce violence.

    It is now in YOUR hands to identify this low life and bring his identity to my attention and the attention of the police.

  4. David McKalip

    Tony, Chuck,
    I am sorry you are concerned that this person has been linked to your group. I have every reason to draw that conclusion.

    1. AT the Occupy meeting last saturday, your “Direct ACtion” group stated they were “targetting” people (Lenny Flank said this) and that it must be kept secret to protect the safety and integrity of those carrying out the operation.

    2. You each and many on your movement have justified several violent activities as completely acceptable. You have done so to me on the web and personally. These activities that you not only refuse to renounce, but actually think are legitimate include: Kidnapping (so called “Citizens arrests”), Breaking and entering (entering private abandoned property, Tresspassing (entering private businesses and “occupying” their facilitites), obstructing traffic (blocking streets and ports) and more.

    3. You and your group BANNED ME from your forums for suggesting that you specifically renounce those activities and took offense that I would even raise the subject.

    4. There are leaders in the shadows who are pulling the puppet strings that you refuse to identify in public. Why?

    5. I have not been involved with ANY OTHER Occupy group. The message I received specifically occured because of my activities on my blog to shed light on what your group was doing.

    6. There are people in your group who have been incredibly rude and confrontational to me asking me to leave and telling me that I had no right to speak because I did not agree with what you were trying to accomplish…all while you won’t even SAY what you want to accomplish! (Maria Agosto, Maria JOse, Frank the DNC marketting operative).

    7. Remember, I HAVE been targetting by your group as one to ban and to attack. This has occured on your forums using nonsensical reasons that simply amount to “we don’t want to have this guy here”.

    So, I have every reason to draw these conclusions. Even though many of you are kind and accepting, in the end you each and everyone supported banning me form the forums for my call to renounce violence.

    It is now in YOUR hands to identify this low life and bring his identity to my attention and the attention of the police.

  5. Nick

    If I were a judge or a juror, I would find this as an empty threat. The intentions of Mr. Montoya have not been stated, nor has his specific complaint against you.
    While I consider myself a proud American who is God-loving, I also recognize the flaws in many organizations whether it be the Tea Party or the Occupy Movement.
    I also think that the name calling, from both sides is counter-productive. The Occupy Movement, like the Tea Party rallies from a few years back, have gotten people out into the streets away from the TV and computers. Whoever is responsible, the political/financial architects, of both of these movements cannot micro-manage the dialogue between an Occupier and a Tea Partier standing on Central Avenue in St. Petersburg.
    I’ve had productive conversations with Tea Partiers, at a Lakeland rally 3 years ago, and with Occupiers in Tampa 2 months ago.
    Let’s focus on talking specifically with individuals whose views oppose ours so that we can reach a respectable agreement, before ANY government agency comes in and messes it up for all of us.
    Remember, Jesus said “A house divided among itself, will certainly fall”. The government’s social engineers know this. Don’t be fooled by labels or names of participants.

Comments are closed.