Gay Leaders: Reject Gay Gestapo. #boycottmozilla #uninstallfirefox


The Gay Gestapo will not tolerate other viewpoints. They act just like the state police in the Twilight Zone episode "The Obsolete Man".

The Gay Gestapo will not tolerate other viewpoints. They act just like the state police in the Twilight Zone episode “The Obsolete Man”. Let Mozilla know that INTOLERANCE OF FREEDOM is not acceptable in our society. Uninstall Firefox and Boycott Mozilla to send the message. Share This image by social media with #boycottmozilla or #uninstallfirefox to help.

Freedom in America is under assault by a Gestapo of Gay activists who cloak themselves in “tolerance” while being entirely intolerant!  Over the last week Gay extremist launched an campaign to freeze out the Firefox browser since the new CEO of the company (Brendan Eich) had done something they could not tolerate. He disagreed with them. Six years ago. By donating $1,000 to the Proposition 8 effort in California to define Marriage in California as between a man and a woman.  The response by the Gay extremists was to bully the Company Mozilla into forcing the resignation of the creator of Javascript and the Firefox browser code. Mozilla caved to the Gestapo-like tactics of the gay extremists and apologized profusely. Ironically as they fired Eich for subtly exercising free speech with a political campaign contribution, they stated “Mozilla believes both in equality and freedom of speech”. Not.

There is now a backlash against Mozilla for caving to a group of thugs who would intimidate any with a different thought from having a job, existing or participating in the democratic process or society itself. This is the same sort of Gay Gestapo tactic used to attempt to Boycott Chik-Fil-A and or that led Cracker Barrel to pull duck dynasty products. Those were also rejected by the American people. That is why the Sun Beam Times is joining so many others in calling for people to uninstall their Firefox browsers to let Mozilla know that their intolerance of freedom is unacceptable in a free society. This author has uninstalled his Firefox browser and asks others to do the same and to share the act on social media with such notices as #uninstallfirefox and #boycottmozilla.

Could this be the last straw by the “progressive” crowd that claim to support democracy and freedom but seek to chill the very individuals in society who are its beneficiaries and foundation? One hopes that this will send the Gay Gestapo to the dustbin of history where they belong, but it is not likely. Two notable Gay leaders have spoken out vociferously against these extremist tactics. 

Andrew Sullivan (108K Twitter followers) is a well known gay blogger who published this piece on The Dish: “The Hounding of a Heretic” and followed with “The Hounding of a Heretic, ctd”. He offered:

“The whole episode disgusts me – as it should disgust anyone interested in a tolerant and diverse society. If this is the gay rights movement today – hounding our opponents with a fanaticism more like the religious right than anyone else – then count me out. If we are about intimidating the free speech of others, we are no better than the anti-gay bullies who came before us.”

Ofcourse, the gay extremists also attacked him to as too impure.

Then well-known lesbian talk show host Tammy Bruce was also disgusted and offered via twitter (74.5K followers):
Hi @mozilla, I’m a gay woman who is appalled that you caved to the Gay Gestapo. So who else will be pressured to leave for not conforming?”

There are ways that free societies are lost and it is not usually started by governments. Free societies are lost when the members of that society turn on each and demand that people conform to unity of thought or turn off their mind. See Nazi Germany, Soviet Russia, Communist China, Talibani Afghanistan. When enough free expression, free action and free thought has been chilled and ground out under foot, THEN large tyrannical governments are put into place to enforce the “brave new world”. The chilling of freedom is amoral.  It is why John Adams warned us that our society can only exist if its people are moral – our Constitution is designed for a moral people. In this case the morality we require is the morality of allowing open exchange of ideas and choice of action in the market place. We obviously need to reject overt actions that seize freedoms away from one group or individuals (slavery, Jim Crow). But we must not crush free thought that allows a plurality of reasonable choices that harm no one.

In the end the best solution for marriage is to get the government out of it completely. No penalties or benefits for marriage granted by the government. Only enforcement of legal contracts. People can already get married in whatever institution will marry them – but that should not include a government that should be limited in its scope anyway. My Catholic Church won’t marry gays and lesbians and never should. But on the current course it is only a matter of time before the Gay Gestapo demand that Catholic Churches offer the Sacrament of marriage to gays and lesbians or cease to exist. There are plenty of places for gays and lesbians, and heterosexual men and women to marry. Leave the government out of it. For the record, I would have voted against Proposition 8 as I don’t believe marriage belongs in any government’s constitution.

3 Replies:

  1. Westech

    Cannot wait to hear the “progressive” left defend this Orwellian suppression of Mr. Eich freedom of speech. As I read yesterday, there is nothing more intolerant than a liberal screaming for tolerance.

    It is rather amazing when mainstream gay activists, writers, talk show hosts etc. condemn the gaystapo wing of the movement.

  2. The Last Lawyer

    Brendan Eich could sue the Gay Gestapo for tortious interference with contractual relations. However, he will have a hard time finding a lawyer to do so because the Bar regulators are predominately gay and will steal the license of any lawyer any time that they want to do so.

    Yep, you no longer have the right to counsel. Instead, you have the right to hire someone posing as an attorney who will take your money and tell you that they will pursue justice for you; however, all attorneys fear doing anything that will anger their Bar regulators. Plus, in case you haven’t noticed, no one regulates the Bar regulators.

    In fact, U.S. Supreme Court Justices Douglas and Black predicted that mandatory Bar licensing would be used to control lawyers, prohibit challenges to the establishment, and cover up misconduct by powerful interests. It sure looks like their predictions were accurate. See their dissents in Lathrop v. Donohue, 367 U.S. 820 (1961) at beginning at 866. Justice Douglas even said that Bar associations had the potential to become goose-stepping brigades. Id. at 884.

    By the way, has anyone else ever read Articles V and VI of that quaint old Constitution, and if so, do you wonder why no one has taken action to restore the right to counsel?

    Could it be because no lawyers will challenge their Bar regulator rulers?

    Unfortunately, as U.S. Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., said the law is only what is enforced and if you control enforcement of the law, you control everything.

    Naturally, we were not supposed to have to fear our rulers and beg them to be nice, but the rights of the people to secure liberty and justice were stolen while the “Greatest” generation was distracted by planned impoverishment and war.

  3. Pingback: #BoycottMozilla for caving to mentality of the Gay Gestapo | Viewpoints of a Sagitarrian

Comments are closed.